FNED 546 Weekly Blog Assignment #2 – The Broken Model (from The One World Schoolhouse: Education Reimagined) by Sal Khan
QUOTES REFLECTION
Sal Khan’s The Broken Model is a searing condemnation of the
“normal” education system in the United States, starting right away with
criticism of the actual concept of “normal.”
“Normal is what you’re
used to. It seems to be part of human nature that customs and institutions come
to seem inevitable and preordained. This sense, even when it’s illusory, gives
a stubborn staying power to habits and systems that have been around a while –
even after it’s become clear that they’re no longer working very well.” (Page
61)
Khan uses this description of normalcy to highlight issues
he has with the current (long-standing) structure of the U.S. school system,
originally championed by former Secretary of the Massachusetts State Board of
Education Horace Mann. It was based on the Prussian model which some believe
instilled values like promptness, attendance, obedience to authority, and
scheduling time according to a bell schedule – all of which would prepare
students for employment in the soon-to-arrive industrial age. Khan makes two
separate points in this chapter:
“There are two related points I’m driving at here. The first
is that creativity in general tends to be egregiously underappreciated and
often selected against in our schools. The second point – and in my view this
is nothing short of tragic – is that many educators fail to see math, science,
and engineering as ‘creative’ fields at all.” (Page 98)
Aside from the stifling of creativity and original thought,
Khan takes issue with the very concept of testing, saying:
“Tests measure the approximate state of a student’s memory
and perhaps understanding in regard to a particular subset of subject matter at
a given moment in time, it being understood that the measurement can vary
considerably and randomly according to the particular questions being asked.”
(Page 92)
As the creator of the online Khan Academy and the
Schoolhouse.world non-profit initiative, Khan continues to provide avenues for
students to acquire knowledge independently and at their own pace, before
working in teams to utilize their learnings in a concept known as “flipped
classroom.”
I’m not well-read enough to take a stand on whether the U.S.
educational format needs overhauling, but any system that’s been in use for
over 170 years could certainly benefit from some introspective review. I think Khan deserves credit
for not just pointing out a problem, but illustrating (and making a reality)
his option for a superior system.
REFLECTION: Khan also makes a good point that “…those who
prosper under a given system tend to become supporters of that system. Thus the
powerful tend to have a bias toward the status quo.” Is the simmering unrest about
wage and wealth inequality in America tied to the continuation of the basic
educational construct in American schooling?
I particularly appreciate the way you linked Khan’s critique of the traditional educational model to broader social issues, such as inequality. I have cited Bourdieu and Passeron on my blog; they worked on a key concept: "social reproduction." This concept sheds light on how schools perpetuate social inequalities. The observation that "normality" is merely a reflection of our habits—rather than of what is optimal—strikes me as particularly pertinent today. Furthermore, I agree that a 170-year-old system warrants re-examination, especially given that creativity and intellectual flexibility have become essential for today's learners. The "flipped classroom" model proposed by Khan appears to be a promising step forward in refocusing education on mastery and curiosity, rather than on mere rote memorization and conformity.
ReplyDelete